|
A Dream of Music and Technology
By
March 1, 2005
The Dallas Symphony Orchestra performs the world premiere of Cindy McTee's Einstein's Dream later this month. LeAnn Binford talks to the composer.
From March 31 through April 2, the Dallas Symphony Orchestra will present the world premiere performances of Cindy McTee’s Einstein’s Dream. McTee recently offered the following thoughts from her office at the University of North Texas in Denton, where she is regents professor of music composition.
What was your inspiration for Einstein's Dream?
The Dallas Symphony Orchestra's theme for 2004-2005, Music of Nations,
demonstrates relationships between composers and their native countries. Einstein's Dream
reflects my fascination with the artistic potential of the personal computer, an American invention
capable of changing traditional concepts of musical sound and time. Ever since the Industrial
Revolution, we Americans have embraced science and technology as a major part of our national identity.
I am personally intrigued by the discoveries of science and especially by the ways in which the arts
and sciences intersect. Both fields investigate the unknown, propose theories, experiment with
possibilities, attempt to unify disparate elements and resolve paradoxes, and generally help
us better understand ourselves and the world in which we live. Can you tell us something about the title?
This piece brings music and technology together in a celebration of the 100th
anniversary of the miraculous year (1905) in which Albert Einstein published three important
papers on quantum theory, Brownian motion, and the special theory of relativity. How do you bring music and technology together in your composition?
Einstein's Dream is written for string orchestra, percussion,
and computer-processed sounds recorded on CD. My process for incorporating computer music began
by recording the sounds of familiar metal objects and metallic percussion instruments such as
stainless steel bowls, chimes, and suspended cymbals. I also obtained a recording of DSO Artistic
Administrator Victor Marshall reading passages from the writings of Albert Einstein. Then, using
audio processing software, I modified those sounds, sometimes beyond recognition; I listened
to them, tried to learn from them, and thought about how they and the sounds of the orchestra could
be stitched into the same musical fabric. At times, I completely merged the orchestral and computer
music sounds, inserting them into the other's acoustical environment to create a single, unified
sonority. Have you worked with the computer medium before?
I first began working with personal computers in the late 1980s. At that time,
I used the earliest Macintosh computers and some Yamaha tone modules to compose two electronic
pieces that had a huge impact on the ways in which I subsequently approached writing for traditional
instruments: my hearing was sharpened; I became much more attentive to nuances of attack, sustain,
and decay; I was able to imagine new textures and timbres; and I could also hear more details of pitch
and rhythm, as if looking at sound and time through a microscope. Why did you decide to incorporate computer music into your new work for the DSO?
Following my electronic pieces in the 1980s, I wrote what has become my most
performed orchestral work, Circuits. I continued to write acoustic pieces but with the
intention of returning to the computer music medium when the opportunity presented itself. In
2003 I received a grant from the American Academy of Arts and Letters that allowed me to buy the necessary
hardware and software, and shortly thereafter, the DSO asked me to write a new piece. I proposed
Einstein's Dream, the idea was welcomed, and I began work in May of 2004, finishing the piece
about seven months later. What do you find compelling about the computer music medium?
I think the great tradition and refinement of orchestral music beautifully
complements the futuristic 'rough edges' of electronic music. I was very much aware of boundaries
crossed when, in composing Einstein's Dream, the computer music grew out of the orchestral
music and vice versa, the two mediums modulating and merging with one another to represent multiple
meanings and multiple temporalities. While I am attracted to the immediacy, risk, and excitement of live performance,
I also enjoy the distance, safety, and control associated with pre-recorded computer music. Computers
allow us to effectively 'stop' sound, to capture, store, modify, and to play back sounds, thereby
changing our relationship with time. I am particularly fascinated by the interplay between the
kind of time embodied by pre-recorded computer music (fixed and machine-like) and the kind of time
represented by live performance (approximate and human). Back to Einstein -- wasn't he a musician?
He was a devoted amateur violinist and believed that the greatest scientists
are always artists, as well. Einstein's love of music was not always rewarded with perfect mastery,
however. A more competent musician is reported to have shouted at him, 'Einstein, can't you count?'
Einstein believed that both music and scientific research are nourished
by the same source of longing. It seems to me, too, that the longing behind a composer's search for
meaning is the same longing that inspires the scientist confronted with the inescapable mystery
of observable reality.
|